My Early Modern Literature and Culture course (aka Shakespeare's Sister) at Marylhurst University introduced me to commonplace books this term. These books have been around for centuries, and they may be a great choice for you to record important passages from books, personal reflections or observations, or the occasional sketch or two. Thinking back to diaries of family members that I remember coming across as a child, I suspect I've seen these before without recognizing them for what they were.
I love the idea of the commonplace book, and I will certainly recommend the practice. In fact, people often ask me how to become a better writer, and this may become one of the tools I talk about in the future--e.g. reading, writing, and living. For years, I did used to carry a writer's notebook. I remember taking mental notes of characters or dialogue from public places, and these daily snapshots would usually find themselves added to my trusty notebook. (When I considered a law enforcement career in the late 1980s and early 1990s, pocket notebooks took on a whole different kind of purpose in recording notes on techniques and...people.) Today, I tend to rely on my camera to remind me of important scenes or landscapes. Conveying a solid and sharp sense of place within my fiction is tremendously important to me, and this method tends to work well. When it comes to recording dialogue, I usually record notes on electronic devices, but I do occasionally use old fashioned notebooks or journals. The digital audio recorder can also be useful.
For taking notes of passages of writing that are personally important, there are many different approaches I use on a daily basis. Much to my mother's disappointment, I'm afraid, I tend to highlight important passages in traditional books. I also enjoy using the "highlighting" feature found in eBooks. For a writer, even published articles can be a way to remember favorite quotes, as this article is a single example. Applications such as Evernote are also a great way to record important information along these lines. (You can even record You Tube videos!) In short, then, I probably won't be changing how I take notes insofar as this experience is concerned, but that doesn't mean it wasn't a valuable experience. I would add that the commonplace exercise is helpful in enhancing attention to detail within works. For me, it also offers an interesting insight into where my own note-taking methods could be improved and strengthened.
So, when it comes to commonplace books, these are great tools for the present, and they have the potential of providing glimpses and insights of the "hidden transcripts" of those who lived before us. Are they something I will personally continue? Probably not, but the fault lies with me alone. You see, I really can't stand my own handwriting. If this doesn't present a challenge for you personally, go for it!
(Here are some additional examples of commonplace books from Pinterest.)
Saturday, November 19, 2016
Sunday, November 6, 2016
Samuel Beckett's Faith as Reflected in Belacqua
Every once in a while, I like to share essays from my academic side here. Here's a short academic response essay I recently did with regards to Samuel Beckett.
4. Belaqua is described as “a dirty lowdown Low Church Protestant high-brow”, and is clearly alienated from the society around him. Beckett himself was born into an Anglo-Irish Protestant family; do you think Belaqua’s alienation is specific to the Irish context, or is Beckett making a larger point about human alienation beyond a specific culture?
I should preface this with a confession that reading Samuel Beckett did not come naturally for me. More Pricks than Kicks posed a daunting challenge at times, but one thing it reminded me about was the life of C.S. Lewis, who was raised in Belfast. I recalled Joseph Pearce's remarkable book entitled C.S. Lewis and the Catholic Church. While my Pearce collection, along with most of my Tolkien, Lewis, and Chesterton, remains to be unpacked in the garage after a recent move, I did find what I feel is an illuminating interview response about Lewis' Irish upbringing from Pearce.
One of Lewis's closest friends, the great Catholic writer, J. R. R. Tolkien, believed that Lewis failed to become a Catholic because of the deep-rooted and ingrained prejudices that he inherited as a Belfast Protestant. As the Troubles in Northern Ireland have shown, Belfast is one of the most sectarian cities in the world. It would indeed be a rare occurrence for someone raised in such an anti-Catholic culture to overcome the prejudices of his upbringing and there is no doubt that Lewis's discomfort with the position of the Virgin Mary in Christian tradition and his unease with the institution of the papacy are typical of the prejudices held by Ulster Protestants. On the other hand, as my book seeks to demonstrate, Lewis seemed to be moving ever closer to Catholicism as he grew in his faith. It is this tension between Lewis's ingrained opposition to Catholicism and his rational attraction to Catholic doctrine which makes the study of Lewis's relationship with the Church so fascinating. (Pearce, Web)
I suggest that Lewis' own troubled feelings from being a young Protestant in Belfast can shed further light on the Samuel Beckett's ambivalence and alienation with regards to Protestantism in Ireland--and religion in general. The shared faith experiences of Beckett and Lewis are interesting as both turned away from organized religion for a period. While, of course, C.S. Lewis returned to the faith with a passion, the alienation experienced by Beckett permeates his work.
Religion seems to occupy the mind of Belacqua Shuah primarily when he is alone, however. In the presence of others, his mind seems less drawn to reflect on the eternal. In the opening of "Walking Out," there is a short, but telling observation from the character. "It was one of those Spring evenings when it is a matter of some difficulty to keep God out of one's meditations." This implies not only an indifference to God, but an active opposition to the presence of the eternal. When Belacqua is in public settings, however, he seems less prone to this kind of introspection. In this way, then, we could aruge that noise and bustle is perhaps partially pursued as a means to drown out the other, more troubling thoughts.
The introspection appears to also catch Belacqua in his nature escape at the opening of "Fingal." "He began to feel a very sad animal indeed." When he wistfully refers to a distant sight as "magic land," Winnie corrects him reproachfully; his meandering mind gets him into trouble. Again at the conclusion of "Walking Out," he seems caught off guard by the silence and stillness of the forest as he waits in vain for Lucy. (I still don't understand his battle with the "Tanzherr.") Silence leads to an increase of noise in the mind, one again can argue. When shadows of the eternal nature of things begin to invade his thoughts, he seems to seek out ways to escape.
I think it's also helpful here to point out that the protagonist of these tales by Beckett, shares a name with a character from Dante's Divine Comedy. (Bold added to excerpt below.)
I came to him he hardly raised his head, Saying: "Hast thou seen clearly how the sun O'er thy left shoulder drives his chariot?" His sluggish attitude and his curt words A little unto laughter moved my lips; Then I began: "Belacqua, I grieve not For thee henceforth; but tell me, wherefore seated In this place art thou? Waitest thou an escort? Or has thy usual habit seized upon thee?" And he: "O brother, what's the use of climbing? Since to my torment would not let me go The Angel of God, who sitteth at the gate. First heaven must needs so long revolve me round Outside thereof, as in my life it did, Since the good sighs I to the end postponed, Unless, e'er that, some prayer may bring me aid Which rises from a heart that lives in grace; What profit others that in heaven are heard not?" (Dante, Divine Comedy)
So, is Belacqua perhaps a sort of secular pilgrim? Instead of searching for the spiritual, I suggest he's doing his best to avoid any hint of the supernatural in his pursuit of secular knowledge and experience. In this determination to avoid the spiritual dimension of Irish life, he is further alienating himself from his countrymen (not to mention God). This paints a picture, then, of someone who is timidly committing to the secular, turning his back on all associations with faith, yet unable to avoid the occasional backslide back to reflections upon the nature of faith and reality. He is in a self-imposed exile.
Beckett, Samuel. More Pricks than Kicks. New York: Grove, 1972. Print.
Dante Alighieri (2011-03-24). Divine Comedy, Longfellow's Translation, Purgatory (p. 21). Kindle Edition.
Pearce, Joseph. "C. S. Lewis and the Catholic Church - CNA Columns: Guest Columnist." Catholic News Agency. N.p., n.d. Web. 04 Nov. 2016.
Saturday, September 24, 2016
Facing the Truth About Facebook
(This essay first appeared in Oregon Catholics, a private group from Facebook.)
It's not that I have anything against Facebook... On second thought, maybe I do have a little something against it. In many ways, I think it encourages some of the poorest dimensions of our culture: shallowness, pettiness, inauthenticity, and meaningless busyness--the antitheses of reflection and substantive work. So much of Facebook to me really boils down to pettiness and silly acts of pointless reciprocation. I'm friends with many who seem unaffected by its message, always upbeat and positive. With me, though, it seems less than a positive influence, encouraging an unhealthy dynamic and distracting me from the important things, the eternal things. For instance, why should we be encouraged to seek affirmations in the forms of “likes” or congratulatory observations? If we are running the good race, what concern should we really have with what others think of us? A young Catholic singer named Alanna Marie-Boudreau recently described social media with the following wise words. “We are fain not to admit that we've made God into a presence as vapid and illusory as the happy surge of emotion we feel when we see those little red notifications assuring us of our position in virtual society.”
It's not that I have anything against Facebook... On second thought, maybe I do have a little something against it. In many ways, I think it encourages some of the poorest dimensions of our culture: shallowness, pettiness, inauthenticity, and meaningless busyness--the antitheses of reflection and substantive work. So much of Facebook to me really boils down to pettiness and silly acts of pointless reciprocation. I'm friends with many who seem unaffected by its message, always upbeat and positive. With me, though, it seems less than a positive influence, encouraging an unhealthy dynamic and distracting me from the important things, the eternal things. For instance, why should we be encouraged to seek affirmations in the forms of “likes” or congratulatory observations? If we are running the good race, what concern should we really have with what others think of us? A young Catholic singer named Alanna Marie-Boudreau recently described social media with the following wise words. “We are fain not to admit that we've made God into a presence as vapid and illusory as the happy surge of emotion we feel when we see those little red notifications assuring us of our position in virtual society.”
If you examine
social media as it may particularly relate to what the Catechism of the Catholic Church refers to as “the formation of
conscience,” it raises several serious concerns. What influence may social media platforms
like Facebook have upon the young, for instance? In books like What the Internet is Doing to Our Brains, The Shallows by Nicholas
Carr, the reader discovers some astonishing and frightening realities and
statistics associated with the time spent within virtual reality; our minds,
our very levels of concentration, are changing for the worse. These changes may prove to be permanent in
both a personal and cultural sense.
While the formation of one’s conscience is (probably) altogether different
than our dwindling attention spans, it’s hard to imagine that the cause of
social media, our virtual lives, won’t have an effect upon the way people
interact and view each other. Most of us
have likely found ourselves sharing a particular item in hopes that its sharing
would be well-received, eliciting those exciting “little red notifications.” If this becomes a Pavlovian feature in any
larger sense, then our very moral identities are at risk.
The following
Catechism passage, for instance, reminds us that “the education of conscience
is a lifelong task.”
1783 Conscience must be
informed and moral judgment enlightened. A well-formed conscience is upright
and truthful. It formulates its judgments according to reason, in conformity
with the true good willed by the wisdom of the Creator. The education of
conscience is indispensable for human beings who are subjected to negative
influences and tempted by sin to prefer their own judgment and to reject
authoritative teachings.
1784 The education of the
conscience is a lifelong task. From the earliest years, it awakens the child to
the knowledge and practice of the interior law recognized by conscience.
Prudent education teaches virtue; it prevents or cures fear, selfishness and
pride, resentment arising from guilt, and feelings of complacency, born of
human weakness and faults. The education of the conscience guarantees freedom
and engenders peace of heart.
It is
instructive to briefly examine three particular dimensions of the social media
phenomenon as it stands before the blazing light of Holy Scripture and
tradition. The first dimension is
humility. In Luke 14:10, Christ teaches
us to seek the lowest place of honor at the table. What kind of teaching could be more
diametrically opposed to the “me first” mantra echoed across social media? Look at what I have is at the root of its
purpose: see me, and not see Him.
The second
explored dimension of social media for readers’ consideration is the evidence
of moral decay and sin: moral entropy, if you will. Isaiah 5:20-21, for instance, puts the reality
of good and evil in perfect clarity and perspective within our daily lives.
20
Woe
to those who call evil good
and good evil,
who
put darkness for light
and light for darkness,
who
put bitter for sweet
and sweet for bitter.
21
Woe
to those who are wise in their own eyes
and clever in their own
sight.
In how many
different ways do we see good called evil and evil called good within today’s
culture? From churches to the media,
books could be written about these examples alone. It’s one of the many reasons that led my own
family away from the Episcopal tradition and into the Catholic Church. Even across Catholic institutions of higher
education, however, we see an Orwellian Newspeak taking root and beginning to
flourish. If you disagree with the
administrative powers that be, you are likely to be isolated and
ostracized—placing even your livelihood at risk. A particular Catholic professor and friend
just recently voiced serious concerns along these lines, and he’s by no means
alone. In this sense in particular,
there are a multitude of ways that social media may both encourage and enable
the muzzling and silencing of those critical, free-thinking voices. After all, as C.S. Lewis wrote within his
essay entitled “Equality” from Present
Concerns, “when equality is treated not as medicine or a safety-gadget but
as an ideal we begin to breed that stunted and envious sort of mind that hates
all superiority.”
The third point
to bear in mind is that we are not of this world (John 18:36). We shouldn’t be endeavoring to be loved or
admired, but to show the world what an authentic life lived for Christ looks
like. We’re all fallen creatures,
requiring the redemptive sacrifice of Christ.
Yet, the social media mantra is that it’s all good; if it feels good, do
it. This suggests a person at ease with
the world, rather than an individual moving on an entirely different
course. If our minds are set on the
eternal, then we can’t be at peace with the world. Christianity is not about bringing harmony
between everyone, but about declaring the truth and salvation of Christ. The tenth chapter of Matthew reminds us that the
Gospel will pit father against son, family member against family member. In a dizzying plethora of ways, Facebook
reinforces the lie that belonging to the world is the most important thing,
encouraging us to forget the price at which we were bought (1 Corinthians
6:20).
Facebook offers
tremendously exciting ways to improve and facilitate communication, but it also
comes with a unique set of potential dangers for the Christian. While the mature follower of Christ may be
able to successfully navigate this new moral territory, I am particularly
concerned with the young users who rely daily upon social media platforms such
as Facebook. If the young person is not
vigilant and informed, it may injure the education and formation of his conscience
in profound ways. If Facebook could be
distilled to a moral code, the closest would seem to be moral relativism. For this reason and others, I am seeking to
disentangle my own personal life from social media one strand at a time, but
this is easier said than done. Rather
than embrace the created, let’s endeavor to embrace the Creator with every word
we say and…type.
Links of interest:
Connection Illusion
Is Technology Making Us Rude
Living in the Present
What the Catholic Author Should to Know About #BooksGoSocial
When prospective writers enter the marketplace, they are often flooded with offers to promote, package, or represent their work...for a fee. Sadly, the personal investment in creating a literary work sometimes makes it tempting to look for distribution and marketing shortcuts, and this often leads the author to scams of all shape and sizes. You see, everyone knows how hard it is to sell one's work these days--unless you're someone like James Patterson--and that's why the marketers push so hard to have you purchase their particular brand of literary snake oil.
Sometimes collections or groups of writers can be the exception. I am one of the founders, for instance, of the Catholic Writers' Guild, and (until recently) I was a paid member of an online group called #BooksGoSocial. Part of what ruined my relationship with the group was the copied tweet below.
As a family of fairly new Catholics, we've heard all of this before, you see; it's not new, and it's quite insulting--especially when used as nothing more as a technique to hawk wares online. There's been much written about this topic, but below is a particularly powerful passage from the opening chapter of The Myth of Hitler's Pope: Pope Pious II and His Secret War Against Nazi Germany by Rabbi David G. Dalin.
...Indeed , in 1951, the eminent British writer (and liberal Catholic) Graham Greene could praise him as "a pope many of us believe will rank among the greatest," an assessment shared by many other Catholics and Jews who hailed the pope for his many efforts to save Jewish lives during World War II.
For your reading interest, here is one of this book's powerful reviews.
So, if you're a Catholic and you belong to this online group, I would urge you to leave it behind--at least until Laurence O'Bryan offers an apology. Given the subject matter of his books, however...I won't hold my breath; vitriolic anti-Catholic drivel is likely one of his promotional avenues.
Sometimes collections or groups of writers can be the exception. I am one of the founders, for instance, of the Catholic Writers' Guild, and (until recently) I was a paid member of an online group called #BooksGoSocial. Part of what ruined my relationship with the group was the copied tweet below.
Waiting for Francis to atone for evil Vatican support 4 Hitler? Read https://t.co/nbsA8l2V1w pic.twitter.com/vpxlV9vTat— From BooksGoSocial (@YourNewBooks) September 22, 2016
As a family of fairly new Catholics, we've heard all of this before, you see; it's not new, and it's quite insulting--especially when used as nothing more as a technique to hawk wares online. There's been much written about this topic, but below is a particularly powerful passage from the opening chapter of The Myth of Hitler's Pope: Pope Pious II and His Secret War Against Nazi Germany by Rabbi David G. Dalin.
...Indeed , in 1951, the eminent British writer (and liberal Catholic) Graham Greene could praise him as "a pope many of us believe will rank among the greatest," an assessment shared by many other Catholics and Jews who hailed the pope for his many efforts to save Jewish lives during World War II.
For your reading interest, here is one of this book's powerful reviews.
This is a stunning book. I wish I had known more of this material years ago. -- Michael Novak, George Frederick Jewett Chair in Religion and Public Policy, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research
Other great works on this divisive period of history include The Pope's Jews: The Vatican's Secret Plan to Save Jews from the Nazis by Gordon Thomas and Church of Spies: The Pope's Secret War Against Hitler by Mark Riebling. A movie entitled A Hand of Piece, Pope Pius XII and the Holocaust has also been suggested as an excellent resource, and I look forward to watching it soon.
I would also draw your attention to Catholic saints such as Maximilian Kolbe: people who died trying to save others from the horrors of the Nazi death camps. Saint Kolbe was certainly not alone in his fight; there are more than a hundred Catholic martyrs from this period. (Of course, this doesn't even touch upon other religious persons outside of the Catholic Church--e.g. Dietrich Bonhoeffer. That material is for another day's post, however.)
I am sick and tired of people hurling around their unsubstantiated bias and bigotry towards the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church and Pope Pius XII worked tirelessly in a multitude of ways--from public to private--to save as many of the Jews (and others) as possible. After all, if Christianity is seen as a fulfillment of Judaism, then the Jews are closely connected to our spiritual lives and journey home. More importantly, however, they are human beings created in the image of God.
Fall Reflections
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Starting an LLC in Oregon?
Have you been thinking of starting an LLC in Oregon, but you didn't know quite where to start? This is my first small business themed post, but I hope you find the information offered helpful. Please note that this post is my personal work only, and it does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer. Visitor statistics and feedback will be reviewed later to see whether, or not, this series will continue. None of this information should replace the professional advice received from a reputable attorney or CPA.
As soon as you have met with your CPA and/or attorney, it's time for you to register your business name(s). This registration is done through the Oregon Secretary of State Corporation Division's Business Information Center. Besides registering your business name, you can also register at this same time for your Business Identification Number--used for state tax reporting. Alternatively, you can also use the paper form of the Combined Employer Registration and fax the completed form in as instructed. Bear in mind, though, that using the paper form will create a significant processing delay for you. Completing the online form will result in you obtaining your Business Identification Number (BIN) much more efficiently, but the decision is yours. The Oregon Department of Revenue (DOR) will issue the BIN, and the Oregon Employment Department (OED) will review and send a Notice of Determination (NOD) some time later. This explains how and when your company becomes subject to Oregon Unemployment Tax program. You don't need to wait for the NOD, however. As long as you have your BIN, you can file and pay your quarterly taxes. If you don't want to send checks, you can also pay using the DOR's EFT System.
You're already likely familiar with the federal taxes, but what about state taxes? What do you need to know? There are several different of categories of payroll taxes in Oregon, and it's possible that they won't all apply to you: Oregon State Withholding, Unemployment Tax, Workers Compensation, Tri-Met (Portland Metro), Lane Transit (Eugene Metro), and Canby Transit. Today, we're going to focus more on Unemployment Tax than the other tax programs. This may also be a good time to read the Oregon Business Guide.
Oregon LLCs
Did you know that, unless they elect to be covered, LLC members are excluded from Unemployment Tax by default? (See ORS 657.044(c) and Corporations and Limited Liability Companies flyer.) This means, of course, that if it's only llc members working, you should not be reporting or paying Unemployment Tax. Leave column A blank; don't include zeros, or this will delay return processing at OED. Reporting correctly as an llc will save you a considerable amount of money each year, and it will also ensure that your reports are processed much more quickly and efficiently, because manual corrections won't be required.
LLCs and the Federal Election
One other thing to remember concerns the federal election of the llc, since the limited liability company is a disregarded entity for IRS purposes. This federal election has no bearing on how the OED recognizes your company. In other words, it's like the IRS looks at the llc and sees a corporation, partnership, etc. (whatever you have elected), but Oregon looks at the llc...and sees an llc. Since corporate officers are reportable employees in Oregon, this is a really important distinction for you to clearly understand. The LLC is always an LLC with regards to the UI Tax program. (DOR will recognize the entity the same as the IRS.)
A Few Word About Independent Contractors
One of the most confusing areas for new businesses is making the distinction between employee/employer or independent contractor. Making a mistake here can be expensive and time-consuming to correct. In order for someone to be correctly classified as an independent contractor in Oregon, the person must represent an independent and established business within the same industry in which they are providing services. If the potential "independent contractor," is just a fellow off the street, then you're likely looking at a relationship better categorized as employer/employee.
Ministers and Oregon Independent Contractor Law
Because of this being an area of special interest, I am adding it here. As religious organizations would not usually be llcs, this may appear again if this series continues.
A Quick History Lesson
Before the Oregon Supreme Court’s decision in 2000 (See Newport Church of the Nazarene v. Gordon Hensley and the Oregon Employment Department.), ministers were excluded from Unemployment Tax, making ministers ineligible for unemployment benefits. A key part of the court’s decision is provided below.
In sum, we conclude that, in purporting to draw a distinction between church ministers and leaders of other religious organizations, ORS 657.072(1)(b) violates Article I, sections 2, 3, and 20, of the Oregon Constitution. In light of that conclusion, and in accordance with Salem College and Rogue Valley, we construe the statute consistently with OAR 471-031-0090 (1996) to include both ministers and leaders of other religious organizations in Oregon's unemployment compensation program…
Are Ministers Independent Contractors?
Since the above court decision, there’s frequently confusion when it comes to reporting ministers. The first thing to bear in mind is that ministers are no longer automatically excluded; that’s the result of the Oregon Supreme Court decision. If their compensation is to be excluded from unemployment tax at all, it would hinge on whether, or not, they are indeed independent contractors in accordance to ORS 670.600.
When it comes to ministers, however, it may prove difficult to establish that they are truly independent and free from direction and control in the services they perform. While the independent contractor flyer is an excellent reference, these services often require a more detailed review. Frequently, for example, most churches and religious organizations have doctrinal positions that are defined and established. The pastor who decides on a whim to preach counter to the established doctrinal beliefs of his denomination may risk censure or termination.
On the other end of the religious spectrum, some denominations may assert that their ministers are free to preach any teaching at all. Even for universalists, however, the acceptance of all pathways leading to the same spiritual end is a position which excludes other religious beliefs and positions. In other words, even if an organization were to make the argument that they have no particular set of core beliefs, that they’re open to considering all other faiths and religions, this lack of adherence to a central doctrine becomes (in effect) their doctrine. It’s also difficult to say that you are accepting of everything, because many faiths and traditions are inherently contradictory in nature. In short, then, it’s not an easy thing to establish complete freedom from direction and control for ministers. It may not be readily apparent, but there are almost always either defined or undefined expectations to consider.
What about housing allowances, stipends, and reimbursements?
For UI Tax purposes, housing allowance payments will always be subject. Even if the parsonage was owned by the church and the minister was simply allowed to live there rent free, the fair market value of the rent should be reported as wages for UI Tax.
Stipends are considered subject wages and should always be reported. Honorariums paid to the minister directly are subject if paid by the church or employing enterprise.
Actual reimbursements are excluded as long as there is a valid and written accountable plan, which is consistently followed.
The IRS’ Minister Audit Technique Guide may be of some use, but bear in mind that federal income tax rules often are different from state unemployment tax rules.
Has this post helped you? If so, I'd appreciate hearing from you!
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)












