(This essay first appeared in Oregon Catholics, a private group from Facebook.)
It's not that I
have anything against Facebook... On second thought, maybe I do have a
little something against it. In many ways, I think it encourages some of
the poorest dimensions of our culture: shallowness, pettiness, inauthenticity, and
meaningless busyness--the antitheses of reflection and substantive work.
So much of Facebook to me really boils down to pettiness and silly acts
of pointless reciprocation. I'm friends with many who seem unaffected by
its message, always upbeat and positive. With me, though, it seems less
than a positive influence, encouraging an unhealthy dynamic and distracting me from
the important things, the eternal things.
For instance, why should we be encouraged to seek affirmations in the
forms of “likes” or congratulatory observations? If we are running the good race, what concern
should we really have with what others think of us? A young Catholic singer named Alanna
Marie-Boudreau recently described social media with the following wise words. “We are fain not to admit that we've made God
into a presence as vapid and illusory as the happy surge of emotion we feel
when we see those little red notifications assuring us of our position in
virtual society.”
If you examine
social media as it may particularly relate to what the Catechism of the Catholic Church refers to as “the formation of
conscience,” it raises several serious concerns. What influence may social media platforms
like Facebook have upon the young, for instance? In books like What the Internet is Doing to Our Brains, The Shallows by Nicholas
Carr, the reader discovers some astonishing and frightening realities and
statistics associated with the time spent within virtual reality; our minds,
our very levels of concentration, are changing for the worse. These changes may prove to be permanent in
both a personal and cultural sense.
While the formation of one’s conscience is (probably) altogether different
than our dwindling attention spans, it’s hard to imagine that the cause of
social media, our virtual lives, won’t have an effect upon the way people
interact and view each other. Most of us
have likely found ourselves sharing a particular item in hopes that its sharing
would be well-received, eliciting those exciting “little red notifications.” If this becomes a Pavlovian feature in any
larger sense, then our very moral identities are at risk.
The following
Catechism passage, for instance, reminds us that “the education of conscience
is a lifelong task.”
1783 Conscience must be
informed and moral judgment enlightened. A well-formed conscience is upright
and truthful. It formulates its judgments according to reason, in conformity
with the true good willed by the wisdom of the Creator. The education of
conscience is indispensable for human beings who are subjected to negative
influences and tempted by sin to prefer their own judgment and to reject
authoritative teachings.
1784 The education of the
conscience is a lifelong task. From the earliest years, it awakens the child to
the knowledge and practice of the interior law recognized by conscience.
Prudent education teaches virtue; it prevents or cures fear, selfishness and
pride, resentment arising from guilt, and feelings of complacency, born of
human weakness and faults. The education of the conscience guarantees freedom
and engenders peace of heart.
It is
instructive to briefly examine three particular dimensions of the social media
phenomenon as it stands before the blazing light of Holy Scripture and
tradition. The first dimension is
humility. In Luke 14:10, Christ teaches
us to seek the lowest place of honor at the table. What kind of teaching could be more
diametrically opposed to the “me first” mantra echoed across social media? Look at what I have is at the root of its
purpose: see me, and not see Him.
The second
explored dimension of social media for readers’ consideration is the evidence
of moral decay and sin: moral entropy, if you will. Isaiah 5:20-21, for instance, puts the reality
of good and evil in perfect clarity and perspective within our daily lives.
20
Woe
to those who call evil good
and good evil,
who
put darkness for light
and light for darkness,
who
put bitter for sweet
and sweet for bitter.
21
Woe
to those who are wise in their own eyes
and clever in their own
sight.
In how many
different ways do we see good called evil and evil called good within today’s
culture? From churches to the media,
books could be written about these examples alone. It’s one of the many reasons that led my own
family away from the Episcopal tradition and into the Catholic Church. Even across Catholic institutions of higher
education, however, we see an Orwellian Newspeak taking root and beginning to
flourish. If you disagree with the
administrative powers that be, you are likely to be isolated and
ostracized—placing even your livelihood at risk. A particular Catholic professor and friend
just recently voiced serious concerns along these lines, and he’s by no means
alone. In this sense in particular,
there are a multitude of ways that social media may both encourage and enable
the muzzling and silencing of those critical, free-thinking voices. After all, as C.S. Lewis wrote within his
essay entitled “Equality” from Present
Concerns, “when equality is treated not as medicine or a safety-gadget but
as an ideal we begin to breed that stunted and envious sort of mind that hates
all superiority.”
The third point
to bear in mind is that we are not of this world (John 18:36). We shouldn’t be endeavoring to be loved or
admired, but to show the world what an authentic life lived for Christ looks
like. We’re all fallen creatures,
requiring the redemptive sacrifice of Christ.
Yet, the social media mantra is that it’s all good; if it feels good, do
it. This suggests a person at ease with
the world, rather than an individual moving on an entirely different
course. If our minds are set on the
eternal, then we can’t be at peace with the world. Christianity is not about bringing harmony
between everyone, but about declaring the truth and salvation of Christ. The tenth chapter of Matthew reminds us that the
Gospel will pit father against son, family member against family member. In a dizzying plethora of ways, Facebook
reinforces the lie that belonging to the world is the most important thing,
encouraging us to forget the price at which we were bought (1 Corinthians
6:20).
Facebook offers
tremendously exciting ways to improve and facilitate communication, but it also
comes with a unique set of potential dangers for the Christian. While the mature follower of Christ may be
able to successfully navigate this new moral territory, I am particularly
concerned with the young users who rely daily upon social media platforms such
as Facebook. If the young person is not
vigilant and informed, it may injure the education and formation of his conscience
in profound ways. If Facebook could be
distilled to a moral code, the closest would seem to be moral relativism. For this reason and others, I am seeking to
disentangle my own personal life from social media one strand at a time, but
this is easier said than done. Rather
than embrace the created, let’s endeavor to embrace the Creator with every word
we say and…type.
Links of interest:
Connection Illusion
Is Technology Making Us Rude
Living in the Present
